www.rondavid.net  (© Ron David)

ARABSONG: Celebrations of Life

A journal of truth, humor and occasional beauty dedicated to the principle that every

human life --black, white, arab, jew, american, non-american-- is equally valuable.


SHORT TAKES: Middle East Truth Watch

< HOME

< LINKS   < FAQ

<'Dear Publishers & Agents..' Books Published & in-Progress by Ron David & Friends

=

Middle East

Truth Watch

<INVADING IRAQ

<SHORT TAKES

<ISRAEL

<PALESTINE

<IRAQ  

<Bombing Children

<Starving Children

<WHY my Children?

<ISRAEL-FIRST?

<FOLLOW the MONEY

<MEDIA WATCH

=

At-a-Glance

<MidEast: 10,000 Years at a Glance

<The '90-91 Gulf

<Putting a Jewish State in Palestine

=

Documents

<Gulf War TV GUIDE

<King-Crane Comm.

=

 

 

Taking-Sides-Stephen-Green.gif (221471 bytes)

 

 

War-Crimes-Ramsey-Clark.gif (293523 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

Z-Magazine.gif (497102 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chomsky-Fateful-Triangel.jpg (86666 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

Chomsky-Media-Control.jpg (52334 bytes)

 

 

 

 

 

Arabs & Israel.gif (346155 bytes)


 

ITEM

Have you seen the TV commercials for the new video game -- "Conflict: Desert Storm"?  It shows American soldiers chasing escaping Iraqi soldiers.  I wonder if the new video game includes the part where young -- "17, 18 maybe 20 years old" -- Iraqis trying desperately to surrender or escape were slaughtered by American soldiers driving bulldozers?  The bulldozers buried them alive.  I wonder if the new video game  has taken the photographs of Iraqi body parts -- arms, legs, parts of heads -- sticking up out of the dirt and turned them into animated motion pictures?  I wonder if the thing is like Madden Football Videos?  Do they have a guy with a telestrater to draw circles around the Iraqi body parts sticking out of the dirt?  Do the American soldiers run like Marshall Faulk, all spins and cut backs, faking the inept Iraqis out of their jockstraps?  

Do they have a huge scoreboard so everyone can see the results of the Big Game: 148 Americans and over 200,000 Iraqis, dead?  If that is a war, my dick is Jimminy Cricket.  

(I have a lot more to say about that video game but I don't want to piss people off too much on the first page of these Short Takes.)

 

ITEM

Hajar Abdul Ghani, a young Iraqi student who loved America and planned to become a writer, was interviewed by Laura Flanders shortly after the war: “I was crying,” she said in great aching pauses, “in the car … with my family.  I see people … around me.  I see soldiers…they stand ... in trucks, waiting ... to be taken to Kuwait … so … oooh … oh, when you look at them … the faces … just young men … and you don’t see smiles … young men, 17 or 18 or 20 years old…so frightened … so frightened.  I started to laugh … and I cry at the same time…”

Laura Flanders, “CrossCurrents” -- WBAI-FM, NY  

ITEM

Barbara Nimri Aziz interviewed Hajar’s father, Muhammad Abdul Ghani, Iraq’s preeminent sculptor: “I was in America last year.  I went to Washington for the International Conference of Sculpture.  I was very happy … very happy.  I wished to come back again.  But now I am very sad about what happened to us from the Americans.  All Iraqis are very sad.  If Bush and Saddam Hussein have trouble over politics, they should settle it in a political way — not bomb innocent people.  Shame for America.  Shame.”

B. N. Aziz, “TAHRIR: Voices of the Arab World” -- WBAI-FM, NY

 

ITEM

Let me repeat, we have no argument with the people of Iraq. 

Indeed we have only friendship for the people there.  

U.S. President George Bush, Nov. 15, 1990

 

ITEM

It should be said at once that nothing we had seen or read had quite prepared us for the particular form of devastation which has now befallen the country.  The recent conflict has wrought near-apocalyptic results upon the infrastructure of what had been until January 1991. a highly urbanized and mechanized society.  Now most means of modern life have been destroyed or rendered tenuous. 

Under Secretary General Martti Ahtissari, head of the United Nations Mission to Iraq sent expressly to assess the results of the U.S. bombing--March 1991

 

How Do I Decide Who To Trust?

Three network TV stations, each with its own anchor-people, news “magazines,” names like Koppell, Geraldo, Tony Brown, Mike Wallace, Ed Bradley, Sam Donaldson, plus dozens of role-players, each vying to be The One You Trust; add CNN, PBS, names like Blitzer, Amanapour, Charlie Rose; add The New York Times,The Daily News, Time, Newsweek, Nation...and dozens more, each one with scores of writers and reporters, each vying to be The One You Trust....

    How do you sort through them?  How can you possibly decide who to believe?   How do you decide which one is true, most true, most likely to be true, least untrue? 

    The way I do it is so obvious it borders on being simpleminded. Take any controversial incident—like the Gulf-of-Tonkin thing that started the Vietnam War.  Most people believed LBJ when he said they attacked us; some thought LBJ got his pronouns crossed—they didn’t start it, we did. Years later, LBJ admitted that he made the whole thing up!  You recall one or two people who did say that (but it seemed so preposterous you ignored them...)  If they had it right, put their names at the top of your list.  The first person who told you that the CIA sold drugs or that it was Israel who stole Palestine, not the other way around—put them on your list.  Do that for months, years.  Before long, you know the studs from the duds. If you ask me to name one person who has been right more often than anyone else: Noam Chomsky.  If you want the publications that have it right an astonishing amount of the time, see Z Magazine, The Nation, CounterPunch and Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.  If you want to know which TV station had it right, NONE OF THEM!  A poll taken by F.A.I.R. (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting) came to the astonishing conclusion that the more you watched TV during the Gulf War, the less you knew about it!

Bottom Line: deciding which source of the news to believe is probably the most critical truth-learning decision you'll ever make.

ITEM

Q: What is the history of America's conflict with Iraq?  

A: There is no history of an American conflict with Iraq.  We never had one. On July [I.O.U. the day] 1990, America & Iraq were allies --- the next day they weren't. 

Q: But President Bush says that we are "in imminent danger" of being nuked by Iraq? Is the president mistaken? 

A: No, he's not mistaken -- he's a liar.  

Q: How can you be so sure of that?

A: In the first place, Iraq doesn't have nuclear weapons.  In the second, Iraq has never attacked -- or even threatened to attack --  America.  

Q: Then why are we talking about going to war with Iraq?

A: Exactly!

 

 

ITEM

What is the only country in the world that has ever dropped atomic bombs on another country?

Then where do we get the arrogance to think that we have the right to police this world?   

 

 

ITEM

After we blew the living hell out of Afghanistan ... Osama bin Laden is still alive?  

 

ITEM

On June 7, 1981, Israeli warplanes destroyed an Iraqi nuclear plant.  Every civilized country in the world objected that Israel had no right to bomb another country without provocation.  Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin “explained” that he was preventing another Holocaust, but nobody was buy.  The United States, the Soviet Union and every other moderately civilized country in the world (including France, which sold the nuclear reactor to Iraq) condemned Israel’s attack as a flagrant violation of international law.  

 

ITEM

The issue of oil is much overrated as a primary cause of America’s troubles in the Middle East.  Oil is a convenient surrogate motive (if there’s anything Americans can understand it’s greed) for our highhand treatment of Middle Eastern countries.  If we pretend that oil is the ultimate motive it allows us to maintain the illusion that Israel protects American interests.

 

ITEM

You can shoot me later for my egotism, but for your own good, please hear me out now.

If I could loan everyone in America only three books on the Arab-Israeli conflict, I would give you Noam Chomsky’s The Fateful Triangle, my own book Arabs & Israel for Beginners and Stephen Green’s astonishing book, Taking Sides.  By now most well-educated people are familiar with Chomsky.  He’s brilliant, amazingly thorough, scrupulously fair, pretty damned dull—and his books are everywhere.  Stephen Green’s book, like mine, is insulted, ignored, often out of print and generally pretended out of existence.   

Despite all of my research and my passionate intention to tell the truth in plain ol’ Detroit English, I had one hell of a hard time figuring out why Israel did what it did.  Stephen Green’s book taught me the astonishing truth that Israel, from the 1948 War to Rob Palestine from the Palestinians, had a larger army than all of the Arab nations combined.  And Israel's vision of its future is that it must always have a larger army than all of the Arab nations combined.  That's why Israel attacked Egypt and Syria in 1967.  Their armies were getting a bit too formidable, so the Israelis attacked them where they stood.

What's so special about Stephen Green's Taking Sides?  Stephen Green went to the State Department and read all of the recently declassified documents.  All of Green's evidence is supported by U. S. State Department records.  (IF the "Israel-Firsters" haven't burned them yet.)

So when you ask yourself why America would want to start a war with Iraq...  (nobody in America gives a damn about Iraq; it's like starting a war with Sri Lanka) the only plausible answer is that Israel wants squashed.  I will defend that charge a bit later, believe me.  For now remember two things:

1. In 1981 Israel bombed an Iraqi nuclear reactor.  Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin defended bombing of another nation without provocation as a "preemptive strike."  Nobody fell for Begin's baloney.  Israel was censured by the entire civilized world, including the U. S. (that was before we allowed the Tail to wag the Dog). 

2. There is no such thing as a "preemptive strike."  That is "Israel-Speak" for a Sucker Punch.  Blast the other guy when he's not looking.  Try using that line of reasoning in a courtroom: 

"Why did you shoot that man in his sleep, Menachem?  He didn't attack you?"

"He didn't do it YET, but it's possible that he might do it in the future.  I was defending myself against what he might do in the future?"

 

By the way -- how is President Bush justifying yet another war against Iraq, a country who has never hurt us in any way?  He says it's a Preemptive Strike.

 

ITEM

No fancy talk, no nitpicking, no digressive details, no red herrings can change the fact that the present inhabitants of Israel stole Palestine from the Palestinians.  Stole their land, stole or bulldozed their homes…then called the Palestinians “terrorists” for trying to reclaim their homes and the land they had lived on for centuries. 

 

ITEM (I love this one) 

Ariel Sharon, believe it or not, is Palestinian by birth ... a fact that is certain to piss off everyone on both sides.  

 

 

===

 

PS: There is great deal more to come on this web page.   

Ron D